hi guys,
i have just got a new shiny raspberry pi, i dont know which operating systems is best?
which one do you guys recommend?
While I agree that there is no best, I would say Linux is Linux for the most part. Yes Raspbian is optimized for the RPi HW.tonyhughes wrote:There is no "best".
The majority on this forum (including me) are likely to recommend Raspbian, as it is recommended by the Foundation, it is easy to use, there is good support here and around the internet in general for it, and it is based on Debian - a very well respected & capable Linux distribution.
RiscOS??? That one is news to me as MIPS RiscOS was desinged to run on the MIPS. I had not known that any one had ported it to the ARM.But there are plenty of choices, and the Arch Linux and RiscOS and Fedora communities are equally likely to jump in with a similar story, and all those OSes are good too.
What do you want to do with your Pi? If you want a media centre, then suddenly the recommendation changes to RaspBMC, or if you want to do something RiscOS is fantastic at, then it changes again... etc... etc...
Pedantic much?DavidS wrote:RiscOS??? That one is news to me as MIPS RiscOS was desinged to run on the MIPS. I had not known that any one had ported it to the ARM.
Though I would also recomend at least taking a look at RISC OS (which is and has always been ARM based) as a good alternative. There is an SD Card image available from the Raspberry Downloads page.
It's not really a question of "Which OS crashes the least?", it's more about what you want. If you want a ready-to-go OS, go for Raspbian. If you want a barebones OS that only has the bare minimum, go for Arch.Silverslide wrote:I want to run a C++ program, multithreaded using boost libraries and xerces-c library. Also sqlite but it consist of 1 file as does mongoose. So no problem there. They are compiled into the program. Which OS will be the easiest to install these libraries for? Any experience? A second criterium is stability. Which OS crashes the least?
Thanks!
Probably Linux, depending on the extras. So I would say try linux, and if that does not work for you try FreeBSD.Silverslide wrote:I want to run a C++ program, multithreaded using boost libraries and xerces-c library. Also sqlite but it consist of 1 file as does mongoose. So no problem there. They are compiled into the program. Which OS will be the easiest to install these libraries for? Any experience? A second criterium is stability. Which OS crashes the least?
Thanks!
You enjoy running the slowest possible interpreted languages on earth do you?djatie wrote:i want to run client server with C#/mono/xamarin, xml/sql database (mysql/pgsql/or other) and maybe will run web server, wat os best for me, some time i need gui like ldxe but this not very important. thx for help
In defence of RaspBMC Final, it's very fast and responsive here on a 256MB Rev1 Pi running from an old no-name 4GB Class 6 SDHC card. It drags it's heels noticably on either of my expensive big-name 32GB Class 10 cards, but they both have woefully slow small-transfer speeds compared to any of my cheap Class 4 or Class 6 cards.DavidS wrote: - If you are looking for a some what sluggish media Center then RaspBMC.

That one is not called RiscOS, (or Risc OS) its called MIPS_RISC/os (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_RISC/os), it a much rarer (UNIX like) OS, and came much later than the "real" ARM based Risc OS we were obviously talking about here.DavidS wrote:RiscOS??? That one is news to me as MIPS RiscOS was desinged to run on the MIPS. I had not known that any one had ported it to the ARM.
GTR2Fan wrote:In defence of RaspBMC Final, it's very fast and responsive here on a 256MB Rev1 Pi running from an old no-name 4GB Class 6 SDHC card. It drags it's heels noticably on either of my expensive big-name 32GB Class 10 cards, but they both have woefully slow small-transfer speeds compared to any of my cheap Class 4 or Class 6 cards.DavidS wrote: - If you are looking for a some what sluggish media Center then RaspBMC.
I'm running it from an external 3.5" Seagate 1.5TB HDD now and, with the Pi overclocked within safe limits, it's hard to distinguish RaspBMC speed-wise from XBMC running on my Intel C2D 3.67GHz PC, so I think Sam Nazarko has worked wonders with it!
Did you try typing 'overclock pi' into Google?Phills wrote:Hello GTR2Fan - I know this thread is old, but I was just reading it and had a question. How did you overlock your Pi? Is there a guide of thread that talks about the specifics?
Thanks!
Amazing what information the Raspberry Pi Foundation put on their website.Phills wrote:Hello GTR2Fan - I know this thread is old, but I was just reading it and had a question. How did you overlock your Pi? Is there a guide of thread that talks about the specifics?
Thanks!
GTR2Fan wrote:In defence of RaspBMC Final, it's very fast and responsive here on a 256MB Rev1 Pi running from an old no-name 4GB Class 6 SDHC card. It drags it's heels noticably on either of my expensive big-name 32GB Class 10 cards, but they both have woefully slow small-transfer speeds compared to any of my cheap Class 4 or Class 6 cards.DavidS wrote: - If you are looking for a some what sluggish media Center then RaspBMC.
I'm running it from an external 3.5" Seagate 1.5TB HDD now and, with the Pi overclocked within safe limits, it's hard to distinguish RaspBMC speed-wise from XBMC running on my Intel C2D 3.67GHz PC, so I think Sam Nazarko has worked wonders with it!