BTW recently I got the 64GB flash based PiDrive from western digital and it was a bad idea. I expected WD selected some good flash drive with good random I/O (as they even tuned the HDD based Pi drives to use less power for the Pi) but they did not. They are shipping SanDisk Cruzer Fit SDCZ33-064G-B35 which has very poor benchmarks. There is also poor quality review https://www.raspberrypi.org/magpi/wd-pi ... sh-review/ which does not mention writing speed at all! After receiving it I run some benchmark for testing SSDs and the 4k random writes test almost killed it. The number quickly went down to 100KB/s and below. After stopping the benchmark prematurely (as it took ages and the speed number went down and down) the flash drive remained almost unusable. Any copy of big file to it with windows explorer very soon slowed down to 0KB/s. Even reformatting didn't help. The drive also doesn't support ATA secure erase which is often used to recover poor writing speed. What helped is overwriting sequentially via dd with zeroes. There were specific sections on drive that were much slower to rewrite with zeroes than other (possibly locations stressed by benchmark) but it got better when repeating it. So now it is again ordinary flash drive for storing data but definitely not something suitable for using as root fielsystem on the Pi.
So just wanted to warn you. The HDD based Pi drives are good but the flash based one is not. Probably idea of some marketing person after WD-Sandisk merge. Also the MagPi review did not help as it did not went to such 'depths' as mentioning write speed importance (and also random vs sequential I/O difference).
