No. Wrong.If something works for arm that means it works on the pi right?
Not never. But 2017.Martin Frezman wrote:The short answer to the question in the title/subject line is "No and never". And even if it did, it wouldn't help you in any meaningful way, because none of your existing, x86-based, software would run on it.
Also, I believe it is considered impossible for Netflix (and probably Hulu as well) to run on the Pi, due to licensing stuff.
Although the original Pi used the same ARM chip as the original Roku media player, the software is different. The purpose of Netflix and Hulu are to restrict what you can do with your computer using digital rights management. The purpose of the Pi is to create a flexible general purpose computer for children to learn programming.Martin Frezman wrote:Also, I believe it is considered impossible for Netflix (and probably Hulu as well) to run on the Pi, due to licensing stuff.
Martin Frezman wrote:Comments on the previous two postings:
1) Thank you, ejolson, for (re-) stating exactly what I had already said.
2) Comments about "snapdragon" are irrelevant. If you need help re-parsing the Title/Subject line of this thread, please PM me for assistance.
3) It actually *is* possible to run Windows on the Pi, although I myself have not (yet) done so. First of all, you must limit yourself to Windows 95/98; anything later than that will be un-bearable. So, for people for whom Windows starts with Windows 10 (i.e., that's the only versions they've ever used), you can stop reading now. Anyway, at least one poster here has gotten it to work using QEMU, and at least one other poster says you can install and run it via DOSBOX. I have yet to test either of these ideas.
But the thing is, for many purposes (including the primary one to which I would put this capability), running Win 95/98 would actually be good enough. In fact, I'm pretty sure that at least some version of "Photoshop" runs under Win 95/98.
viewtopic.php?f=62&t=169580ghodan wrote:Not never. But 2017.Martin Frezman wrote:The short answer to the question in the title/subject line is "No and never". And even if it did, it wouldn't help you in any meaningful way, because none of your existing, x86-based, software would run on it.
Also, I believe it is considered impossible for Netflix (and probably Hulu as well) to run on the Pi, due to licensing stuff.
They have windows 10 and Adobe Photoshop x86 version running on Arm without tweaking the photoshop software.
https://www.qualcomm.com/news/snapdrago ... snapdragon
+1 or alternatively a Roku Media Streaming Device. Either will be easier for OPs Mumbensimmo wrote:If it's Netflix and Hulu, then would a Fire TV dongle not just be easier and cheaper, they are very easy to use.
Assuming no SmartTV/DVD.
Perhaps you missed the forum's one rule: "The rules are simple. Be good to each other. This means be kind, be civil, don't spam." You are in the Raspberry Pi Foundation's house. They've asked everyone to be nice to each other. It's not that hard to do.Martin Frezman wrote:1) Thank you, ejolson, for (re-) stating exactly what I had already said.
2) Comments about "snapdragon" are irrelevant. If you need help re-parsing the Title/Subject line of this thread, please PM me for assistance.
That was a really helpful reply. It also helped me learn why ARM architecture is different. Also windows just announced that they are working on windows for ARM so it's a totally valid question, perhaps you should keep up with this stuff if you are going to contribute something useful to a forum devoted to learning.B.Goode wrote:No. Wrong.If something works for arm that means it works on the pi right?
Wait a minute. How much more proprietary than Windows can we get?...and also trying to keep clear of proprietary stuff. ..
I'm not sure what to make of that. My "entertainment" bill for a month is more than I like to think about. Mostly food and alcohol. TV is zero (I have not owned a TV, ever) and all I can consume as much of the internet as I can stand for 10 Euros a month.My total entertainment bill comes to ~70 bucks a month including the internet.
Cheap and easy to use is where the "TV dongle" devices already mentioned come in. Depending on how you define "cheap" and how you define "single board computer", you could be talking about anything from the Intel Gallileo (assuming it's still being made) up to te the Intel NUC. None of them will approach the cost of a Pi, though. The issue here is that Intel and AMD are barely competitors. Intel sets whatever prices it likes (the current absolute top Intel CPU chip lists for $1500) and that leaves AMD a bit of room to struggle along undercutting Intel. The ARM business is much more cut throat. Many different companies competing and competing hard, which has driven prices far below what Intel will accept. The results show in relative sales...x86 on the order of 100 million units per year. ARM designs, over 1 billion units per year. Even within the ARM SBC market, the RPF/RPT are leveraging economies of scale. Eben remarked some months ago about the difficulty of scheduling production runs for "low volume" products...where he defined "low volume" as less than 500K units per year. No other SBC maker that I know of in the business matches that for their total production. and most aren't within an order of magnitude of it.bubblegumpi wrote: Anyways, a bit off the subject but is there a single board computer like the pi that will run windows? I'm trying to make this thing cheap and easy to use, so I don't wan't to buy a blueray player with the internet since I don't own any blue rays, and also trying to keep clear of proprietary stuff. Just want a cheap solution to making a 20$ a month "cable box" like at my house. I run an old lap top into my TV and use the wireless keyboard as the remote. I refuse to subscribe to cable at over 100 bucks a month to watch reruns and commercials.
Yes, there are single-board computers similar to the Pi, that run Windows. This is probably not the best place to seek a recommendation for one (we don't hate them or anything, it just isn't the primary topic here). And you're saying you're trying to steer clear of proprietary stuff, so you want to run... Windows? That's like the most proprietary OS you can choose.bubblegumpi wrote:Anyways, a bit off the subject but is there a single board computer like the pi that will run windows?
I'm trying to make this thing cheap and easy to use, so I don't wan't to buy a blueray player with the internet since I don't own any blue rays, and also trying to keep clear of proprietary stuff.
Just want a cheap solution to making a 20$ a month "cable box" like at my house.
I run an old lap top into my TV and use the wireless keyboard as the remote.
I refuse to subscribe to cable at over 100 bucks a month to watch reruns and commercials.
Do you have a link to such a thing? I have never seen one.Yes, there are single-board computers similar to the Pi, that run Windows.
Maybe this is a reference to the Intel NUC form factor, which is bigger than the Pi but still really small.Heater wrote:CarlRJ,Do you have a link to such a thing? I have never seen one.Yes, there are single-board computers similar to the Pi, that run Windows.
For some values of "really small". It's also an order of magnitude (or more) more expensive than a Pi. About the only way it qualifies as an "SBC" is that the CPU is soldered to the motherboard.ejolson wrote:Maybe this is a reference to the Intel NUC form factor, which is bigger than the Pi but still really small.Heater wrote:CarlRJ,Do you have a link to such a thing? I have never seen one.Yes, there are single-board computers similar to the Pi, that run Windows.