That is a trick question. Some PI engineer will have a mean-time-to-failure; but, the real question is what is the mttf for a PI without heatsinks vs one with heatsinks? I doubt they went to the expense of having military grade components installed... not for $35... so who knows?gamemaniac wrote:What is the useful life expectancy of the raspberry pi 3? how many years and how many hours of use it can go resist to fail?
Yep, just had an SD card catch fire on me. Well almost:I suspect the SD card will crap out before the PI does... way before.
Why do you ask?It does not have an estimate of hours of use after the pi 3 failure?
RPF may have an estimate of MTTF, and may even have published it somewhere, but it only has a limited bearing on how long your sample of one will last.gamemaniac wrote:It does not have an estimate of hours of use after the pi 3 failure?
Code: Select all
uprecords
# Uptime | System Boot up
----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
1 335 days, 17:46:09 | Linux 3.18.7+ Tue Mar 31 17:05:46 2015
2 130 days, 15:49:43 | Linux 3.6.11+ Wed Dec 18 19:52:36 2013
3 112 days, 08:14:35 | Linux 3.6.11+ Wed Aug 28 12:33:35 2013
4 91 days, 05:20:26 | Linux 3.12.24+ Mon Jul 21 10:54:30 2014
5 77 days, 00:36:37 | Linux 3.12.24+ Mon Oct 20 16:15:16 2014
6 71 days, 22:59:51 | Linux 3.6.11+ Tue Mar 12 08:37:44 2013
7 69 days, 20:43:58 | Linux 3.12.35+ Mon Jan 5 15:52:24 2015
-> 8 66 days, 05:39:52 | Linux 4.1.13+ Tue Mar 1 09:54:39 2016
9 43 days, 23:35:53 | Linux 3.10.25+ Mon Apr 28 12:44:21 2014
10 39 days, 21:42:05 | Linux 3.12.20+ Wed Jun 11 12:20:40 2014
----------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
1up in 3 days, 15:04:07 | at Tue May 10 07:38:36 2016
no1 in 269 days, 12:06:18 | at Tue Jan 31 03:40:47 2017
up 1366 days, 22:57:5 | since Tue Jul 17 12:46:07 2012
down 22 days, 04:50:28 | since Tue Jul 17 12:46:07 2012
%up 98.402 | since Tue Jul 17 12:46:07 2012It could.gamemaniac wrote:it can run for 20, 30 years on 16 hours daily?
Not like that here in the US... store returns vary from around 15-90 days, and warranties are usually handled by the manufacturer (not store) for consumer goods, regardless of where it was purchased (store or online)... so that would be element14 usually.Heater wrote:The Pi is a consumer product. As such around here, Scandinavia, it is subject to a two year warranty. That's not to say it won't fail in that time but the store you buy it from has to replace it or refund.
All bets are off for purchases over the internet.
I saw a figure of 40 years for the Pi1.gamemaniac wrote:it can run for 20, 30 years on 16 hours daily?
Yes, and there are established formulae to calculate the chance of failure from the chances for each each component. Basically, you multiply the probability of all the components together to get the probability of continued operation of the whole system. The failure probability is obtained by subtracting that figure from 1.gamemaniac wrote:raspberry uses various components (chips, capacitors) they have quality and durability?
Multiplying the probabilities assumes that the reliability of the components are independent of the way they were connected together. For example, placing a Pi inside a plastic case would likely increase its durability beyond what would be calculated as the product of the individual reliabilities. Connecting it inside a much more durable blender, might have the opposite effect.W. H. Heydt wrote:Yes, and there are established formulae to calculate the chance of failure from the chances for each each component. Basically, you multiply the probability of all the components together to get the probability of continued operation of the whole system.gamemaniac wrote:raspberry uses various components (chips, capacitors) they have quality and durability?
I gave a simple formula (note my use of "formulae"). In part because the Pi doesn't have redundant parts (that takes a more complex formula). I would think that putting a Pi in *any* case would reduce the expected MTBF simply by restricting airflow and making it run (even if marginally) warmer. These sorts of calculations don't generally concern themselves with any sort of abuse to the device.ejolson wrote:Multiplying the probabilities assumes that the reliability of the components are independent of the way they were connected together. For example, placing a Pi inside a plastic case would likely increase its durability beyond what would be calculated as the product of the individual reliabilities. Connecting it inside a much more durable blender, might have the opposite effect.W. H. Heydt wrote:Yes, and there are established formulae to calculate the chance of failure from the chances for each each component. Basically, you multiply the probability of all the components together to get the probability of continued operation of the whole system.gamemaniac wrote:raspberry uses various components (chips, capacitors) they have quality and durability?
But don't worry, we don't actually know what the reliability of the individual components are either, unless they are hard drives, in which case the failure rate over the span is 1, especially if they are made by Kalok.ejolson wrote:Multiplying the probabilities assumes that the reliability of the components are independent of the way they were connected together. For example, placing a Pi inside a plastic case would likely increase its durability beyond what would be calculated as the product of the individual reliabilities.W. H. Heydt wrote:Yes, and there are established formulae to calculate the chance of failure from the chances for each each component. Basically, you multiply the probability of all the components together to get the probability of continued operation of the whole system.