Code: Select all
Git pull
Code: Select all
PROJECT=ION ARCH=i386 make release
Rob
Code: Select all
Git pull
Code: Select all
PROJECT=ION ARCH=i386 make release
rob_brum wrote:Once you have done your first build can you then just doand thenCode: Select all
Git pull
or are there any other steps you need to do?Code: Select all
PROJECT=ION ARCH=i386 make release
Rob
Code: Select all
PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
Code: Select all
PROJECT=Rpi ARCH=arm make release
Make sure you have the correct case as it is case sensitive.rob_brum wrote:Oops thanks, that was my bad copy and paste from the tutorial I did meanCode: Select all
PROJECT=Rpi ARCH=arm make release
Code: Select all
git pull
Code: Select all
PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
trymilhouse wrote:r10977 just built cleanly for me.Hansel wrote: Any idea what's going on with the build issues? Problem at my end or in the repo?
Code: Select all
make clean
git pull
PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
and you *must* delete the build.* folder before doing the make:frying_fish wrote: Make sure you have the correct case as it is case sensitive.
Code: Select all
git pull
You should be good with that.Code: Select all
PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
Code: Select all
rm -rf build.*
and compile everything again?sraue wrote:and you *must* delete the build.* folder before doing the make:frying_fish wrote: Make sure you have the correct case as it is case sensitive.
Code: Select all
git pull
You should be good with that.Code: Select all
PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
Code: Select all
rm -rf build.*
unless you dont follow our commits exactly and really know what they does you should build from scratch.humla wrote:and compile everything again?sraue wrote: and you *must* delete the build.* folder before doing the make:
Code: Select all
rm -rf build.*
Surely we can reuse the object files of stuff that didnt change?
Yes. I'm just trying to output stereo though via HDMI but the source is 5.1. I'm assuming the downmix isn't working correctly or maybe the cpu is maxed out? It didn't happen on another 5.1 video I had though.rey wrote:Anyone having issues with some 5.1 audio sounding almost robotic and the voices being superquiet?
Unfortunately I've tried that. I've also tried completely deleting the OpenELEC.tv folder and re-cloning from scratch. Always the same error.humla wrote:trymilhouse wrote:r10977 just built cleanly for me.Hansel wrote: Any idea what's going on with the build issues? Problem at my end or in the repo?Code: Select all
make clean git pull PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
Can u try going here -> https://github.com/OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv/commits/master and getting the SHA of the last working version (the hex numbers on the right). They are sorted by date.Hansel wrote:Unfortunately I've tried that. I've also tried completely deleting the OpenELEC.tv folder and re-cloning from scratch. Always the same error.humla wrote:trymilhouse wrote:
r10977 just built cleanly for me.Code: Select all
make clean git pull PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
Very odd as I've built loads of images using this VM, and nothing has changed (aside from making sure everything is up to date). I always now get the same error.
Code: Select all
git checkout <SHA code>
Sure. I'm not 100% sure which was the last working commit (for me), but I'll try 89d137cfbd33c27e0eb63647a01d7505f831a239 for starters.humla wrote:Can u try going here -> https://github.com/OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv/commits/master and getting the SHA of the last working version (the hex numbers on the right). They are sorted by date.Hansel wrote:Unfortunately I've tried that. I've also tried completely deleting the OpenELEC.tv folder and re-cloning from scratch. Always the same error.humla wrote:
tryCode: Select all
make clean git pull PROJECT=RPi ARCH=arm make release
Very odd as I've built loads of images using this VM, and nothing has changed (aside from making sure everything is up to date). I always now get the same error.
Then go into your Openelec folder and enterThen try building.Code: Select all
git checkout <SHA code>
No you are not alone. Try putting these settings in /storage/.xbmc/userdata/advancedsettings.xmlarun wrote:Hello,
am I the only one with about 85% CPU usage in XBMC Menu?
I have 10995 build and latest firmware in use.
Thanks for replay.
welshblob wrote:No you are not alone. Try putting these settings in /storage/.xbmc/userdata/advancedsettings.xmlarun wrote:Hello,
am I the only one with about 85% CPU usage in XBMC Menu?
I have 10995 build and latest firmware in use.
Thanks for replay.
<advancedsettings>
<gui>
<algorithmdirtyregions>3</algorithmdirtyregions>
<nofliptimeout>0</nofliptimeout>
</gui>
</advancedsettings>
CPU usage will fluctuate but will generally be much lower when not a lot is going on on the menu. I'd also turn off the RSS feed as well.
Have you rebooted and how are you checking for CPU usage as the only true way is to use top via an SSH session. The CPU usage is high as all the menus are rendered at up to 60fps which was ok when xbmc runs on PC spec machines or even the original xbox but its not very efficient on these low power devices. They added the dirty region options last year to reduce this CPU load so that it only processes those parts of the menus that are being updated.arun wrote:Thanks! But there is no change for the CPU usage if I add this settings. Does anyone know whats the reason for this cpu usage?
Yes, of course I have rebooted it. I have checked the CPU usage via the XBMC Log (left upper corner of TV) and the top in ssh. It's still about 85%. I have no idea why your settings do not work for me.welshblob wrote:Have you rebooted and how are you checking for CPU usage as the only true way is to use top via an SSH session. The CPU usage is high as all the menus are rendered at up to 60fps which was ok when xbmc runs on PC spec machines or even the original xbox but its not very efficient on these low power devices. They added the dirty region options last year to reduce this CPU load so that it only processes those parts of the menus that are being updated.arun wrote:Thanks! But there is no change for the CPU usage if I add this settings. Does anyone know whats the reason for this cpu usage?
Rob
I've tried the settings too. At startup before I move anything, cpu is around 11%. But if I mouseover Movies or TV Shows, it shoots right back up to 85%+ after a slight pause where all the recently added videos are loaded, and then stays there as long as I mouseover. If I go back to something with no content to load on mouseover (Weather, Pictures, System) and hover over that, the CPU, after maybe half a minute, goes way back down.arun wrote: Yes, of course I have rebooted it. I have checked the CPU usage via the XBMC Log (left upper corner of TV) and the top in ssh. It's still about 85%. I have no idea why your settings do not work for me.
Code: Select all
make all-am
make[5]: Entering directory `/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib'
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link /home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/toolchain/bin/host-gcc -std=gnu99 -O2 -Wall -pipe -I/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/toolchain/include -Wl,-rpath,/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/toolchain/lib -L/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/toolchain/lib -o libcroco_rpl.la libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-additional-sel.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-attr-sel.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-cascade.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-declaration.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-doc-handler.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-enc-handler.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-fonts.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-input.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-num.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-om-parser.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-parser.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-parsing-location.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-prop-list.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-pseudo.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-rgb.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-sel-eng.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-selector.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-simple-sel.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-statement.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-string.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-style.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-stylesheet.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-term.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-tknzr.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-token.lo libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-utils.lo
libtool: link: `libcroco/libcroco_rpl_la-cr-additional-sel.lo' is not a valid libtool object
make[5]: *** [libcroco_rpl.la] Error 1
make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib'
make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-tools'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-tools'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/orbdemon/OpenELEC.tv/build.OpenELEC-RPi.arm-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1'
make: *** [system] Error 2
Did you have a second ext4 partition on your Debian SD card?OrbDemon wrote: Any pointers? Either for resolution and continuation of the build or for the pre-built cheat above? It's certainly a good learning exercise - I knew almost nothing about this stuff.