Confused utter newb here. (Well, utter PI newb.)
(I think) I understand what a HAT is; an add on board, the Arduino world calls them shieds, the Pi world calls them HATs, perhaps because they go on top.
OK, so what's a pHAT? In some ads and in context both here and on Google searches I can't see the difference.
- mikronauts
- Posts: 2822
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 7:28 pm
- Contact: Website
Re: HAT vs. pHAT
My understanding is:
HAT = add-on board for 40 pin GPIO pi's with an eeprom for identifying it
pHAT = like above, but size of Pi Zero
HAT = add-on board for 40 pin GPIO pi's with an eeprom for identifying it
pHAT = like above, but size of Pi Zero
jqavins wrote:Confused utter newb here. (Well, utter PI newb.)
(I think) I understand what a HAT is; an add on board, the Arduino world calls them shieds, the Pi world calls them HATs, perhaps because they go on top.
OK, so what's a pHAT? In some ads and in context both here and on Google searches I can't see the difference.
http://Mikronauts.com - home of EZasPi, RoboPi, Pi Rtc Dio and Pi Jumper @Mikronauts on Twitter
Advanced Robotics, I/O expansion and prototyping boards for the Raspberry Pi
Advanced Robotics, I/O expansion and prototyping boards for the Raspberry Pi
Re: HAT vs. pHAT
And typically without an EPROM, I think. Basically anything that doesn't meet the strict physical and electrical specifications of a Raspberry Pi HAT. Lady Ada calls them 'bonnets'.mikronauts wrote: pHAT = like above, but size of Pi Zero
-
- Posts: 14601
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:36 pm
- Location: Vallejo, CA (US)
Re: HAT vs. pHAT
A HAT has a specific size (it has to have mounting holes that match the Pi Models A+, B+, 2B, 2B2, and 3B) plus defined electrical and logical connectivity (EEPROM). The problem people have wrestled with is: What do you call this sort of beastie if it is sized to fit the Pi Zero? "pHAT" is "partial HAT" (it's smaller). As noted, Adafruit calls it a "bonnet" (which creates an interesting ambiguity for the UK readers). These smaller boards don't have a hard and fast set of specs the way the HAT does. There is no formal definition for a "pHAT".
- DougieLawson
- Posts: 41052
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: A small cave in deepest darkest Basingstoke, UK
- Contact: Website Twitter
Re: HAT vs. pHAT
Eh?W. H. Heydt wrote:Adafruit calls it a "bonnet" (which creates an interesting ambiguity for the UK readers).
The part of a car on top of the engine or the woolly thing on top of a baby has no ambiguity. It's something that goes on top.
Any language using left-hand whitespace for syntax is ridiculous
Any DMs sent on Twitter will be answered next month.
Fake doctors - are all on my foes list.
Any requirement to use a crystal ball or mind reading will result in me ignoring your question.
Any DMs sent on Twitter will be answered next month.
Fake doctors - are all on my foes list.
Any requirement to use a crystal ball or mind reading will result in me ignoring your question.