Hello
I have a powet adaptor that gives 5.25 V and 1 A at output.
Is it too much volts?
To be pedantic; 5.35v didn't appear to damage the device.Larry_Adlard wrote:The point is 5.35v didn't damage the device.
I know that that has been stated as official policy (i.e., it came from Dom or Gert and/or someone else "official"), but I don't think that it is true, based on most recent information.hippy wrote:We do know that pushing 6V into the R-Pi "*will* shorten the life of the SoC" (http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewt ... f=2&t=5064) and may damage other things attached to it but it is hard to assess what damage is being done without officially stated recommended and absolute maximum ratings of the SoCs.
I'm afraid you're wrongJoe Schmoe wrote:That is, the SoC doesn't ever see the total input voltage; the SoC, and the rest of the on-board electronics, other than the USB, only sees the output of the first voltage regulator, which drops the input voltage down to 3V3.
It's not really an issue of my being right or wrong. It makes no never minds to me...AndrewS wrote:I'm afraid you're wrongJoe Schmoe wrote:That is, the SoC doesn't ever see the total input voltage; the SoC, and the rest of the on-board electronics, other than the USB, only sees the output of the first voltage regulator, which drops the input voltage down to 3V3.http://elinux.org/RPi_BCM2835_Signals
Indeed, and something that should be clarified, particularly with regards recommended and absolute maximums the SoC is rated for. At present we don't know at what voltage the SoC starts to be permanently damaged, has its life shortened, or by what amount, and we don't know at what voltage it will likely be destroyed.Joe Schmoe wrote:It's not really an issue of my being right or wrong. It makes no never minds to me...AndrewS wrote:I'm afraid you're wrongJoe Schmoe wrote:That is, the SoC doesn't ever see the total input voltage; the SoC, and the rest of the on-board electronics, other than the USB, only sees the output of the first voltage regulator, which drops the input voltage down to 3V3.http://elinux.org/RPi_BCM2835_Signals
Rather, it is an issue of there being conflicting and confusing information floating around on these boards. Not a big deal, certainly not the first time or the last time, but something to be aware of.
It's quite true that 5v goes to BCM2835 into pins labelled battery. This section is labelled SMPS. Presumably, since battery operation is permitted, and battery voltages are nominal, the chip operates it's own switch mode power supply to regulate input. Clearly this would not stand up to excessive abuse but some degree of protection is built in.hippy wrote
For the record, from the circuit diagram - The 5V input voltage goes to SoC, USB and GPIO power pins, plus, via a diode, to the HDMI connector (+5V0_HDMI). The HDMI I2C bus is pulled-up to the 5V input voltage and diode clamped to +5V0_HDMI. That +5V0_HDMI may also be routed back to the R-Pi HDMI hot plug detection circuit when HDMI is connected.
Yeah, I was merely trying to correct the information you were providing, rather than personally calling you out for being wrong (hence the wink). Sorry if I gave the wrong impression!Joe Schmoe wrote:It's not really an issue of my being right or wrong. It makes no never minds to me...
Rather, it is an issue of there being conflicting and confusing information floating around on these boards. Not a big deal, certainly not the first time or the last time, but something to be aware of.
Not the best idea. Presumably if you're making a wearable computer it'll be battery powered? Linear regulators (such as the venerable 7805) are cheap but very inefficient (wasting a lot of power as heat - also not good for a wearable computer!). You'd get much better battery life using a switch-mode regulator - you can get some with the same pinout as the 7805.radio_cosmo wrote:input but plan to tap the +5 rail and hook up to an external 5v regulator (LM7805) which can supply 5v at an amp. I plan to use my 'Pi for a wearable computer.