scruss wrote: ↑Wed May 20, 2020 2:07 am
BasicStamp's weird proprietary programming system is one of the reasons we have Arduino: the Interaction Design folks at Ivrea were using BasicStamps but found them expensive and difficult to program. A grad student put together the first Wiring board using an Atmel µc, and his advisor thought it was such a good idea he ripped the idea off and called it Arduino.
A tube of cheap ATtinys and a programmer might be cheaper and less work - and end up more capable. Alternatively, there are 100 MHz STM32 boards that can run MicroPython at a fair clip.
A very good point plus I already have the programmer for Attinys. I was working at one time in R&D developed PLCs using 2 basic stamps in a network I still have all the prototypes and almost all the production models. I was hoping to get one or two running again. The alternative was to replace the stamps with a new daughter board powered by something else. I've thought about using the propeller but then Atmel chips are much easier to get.
I remember clearly that a PLC costed us about 500USD more if you factor in the software and custom hardware, and we could build our own for less than half.
At one point I know we contacted someone about our project and about 6 months later there was a commercial release of a basic stamp PLC. Might have no connection but we abandoned the project after rushing units into service and switched back to already available device's.
Now PLCs are cheap but a basic stamp is still about the same.