There are several smaller operating systems that have been given room on this board and I feel that it is time that PiBang Linux be given the same treatment.
I formally request that PiBang Linux be given a section in the "distros" sections.
The latest Raspbian 2013-02-09-wheezy-raspbian is now at 3.6 kernelSuper-Nathan wrote:B) What's the point? sure you CAN install all of the things you mentioned in Raspbian. But out of the box PiBang has it installed. Pibang ships with the 3.6.11 Kernel, so you you would have to upgrade your Kernel and firmware in Raspbian. Plus PiBang has it's own repos for software not found in Raspbian like spacefm, fish, and (soon) deadbeef.
that's handy, i was just about to write another sdcard. is there a way we can get updated when there's a new raspbian relese - without pressing refresh on the download page constantlyCloudcentric wrote:The latest Raspbian 2013-02-09-wheezy-raspbian is now at 3.6 kernelSuper-Nathan wrote:B) What's the point? sure you CAN install all of the things you mentioned in Raspbian. But out of the box PiBang has it installed. Pibang ships with the 3.6.11 Kernel, so you you would have to upgrade your Kernel and firmware in Raspbian. Plus PiBang has it's own repos for software not found in Raspbian like spacefm, fish, and (soon) deadbeef.
you need to use rpi-update to get 3.6 kernel i believe.Spid wrote:I regurlarly check the main page http://downloads.raspberrypi.org/images
I was undertaking an update & dist-upgrade on my September install but is still on Kernel 3.2, so thought what the heck start again...
I would rather not use 3rd party toolssej7278 wrote:you need to use rpi-update to get 3.6 kernel i believe.Spid wrote:I regurlarly check the main page http://downloads.raspberrypi.org/images
I was undertaking an update & dist-upgrade on my September install but is still on Kernel 3.2, so thought what the heck start again...

Better not use any of the distros then.Cloudcentric wrote:I would rather not use 3rd party toolssej7278 wrote:you need to use rpi-update to get 3.6 kernel i believe.Spid wrote:I regurlarly check the main page http://downloads.raspberrypi.org/images
I was undertaking an update & dist-upgrade on my September install but is still on Kernel 3.2, so thought what the heck start again...
SN there was a similar post regards Bodhi some months ago and they believe it should be bunched with Raspbain as should Rasbmc.Super-Nathan wrote:As the creator of PiBang, I appreciate your honest, candid, and succinct response.
Tomorrow I will update the "vs" page, as I have been lax on doing so. You are not incorrect saying that it is a customized Raspbian, however it is something special for the following reasons:
1) Newer Kernel
2) Additional repos with additional compiled software as well as software ported from CrunchBang and Aptosid
So yeah, you could change your Raspbian into a PiBang, but it would be hours, not minutes. However, I have now spoken my peace, so I'll shut up.
You actually stated the reason WHY each distro DOESNT get its own forum - there are too many already. Since most distro's are just forks of the ones already there, and there is a general questions forum, all bases are pretty much covered with what we have.Cloudcentric wrote:SN there was a similar post regards Bodhi some months ago and they believe it should be bunched with Raspbain as should Rasbmc.Super-Nathan wrote:As the creator of PiBang, I appreciate your honest, candid, and succinct response.
Tomorrow I will update the "vs" page, as I have been lax on doing so. You are not incorrect saying that it is a customized Raspbian, however it is something special for the following reasons:
1) Newer Kernel
2) Additional repos with additional compiled software as well as software ported from CrunchBang and Aptosid
So yeah, you could change your Raspbian into a PiBang, but it would be hours, not minutes. However, I have now spoken my peace, so I'll shut up.
I stand by what I stated that all operating systems should have their own forum, and maybe take some other forums out, there is too much how do I run this on the Pi, and as I keep saying and getting lambasted for me is pointing out the Pi is hardware not software.
If you use say PiBang it goes in the PiBang Forum it would make life simpler
No need to shout. I've got a Raspi, I know what it is. I've even got a prototype (offers on a postcard)Cloudcentric wrote:No I have not answered, I am saying that having forums for each operating system would hopefully encourage users to post in the forum that is relevant to the Operating System they are using, having it the way it is has too many, as I said before, how do I run it on the Pi THE Pi IS HARDWARE
There already are a bunch of forums with only a few postings in each.jamesh wrote:No need to shout. I've got a Raspi, I know what it is. I've even got a prototype (offers on a postcard)Cloudcentric wrote:No I have not answered, I am saying that having forums for each operating system would hopefully encourage users to post in the forum that is relevant to the Operating System they are using, having it the way it is has too many, as I said before, how do I run it on the Pi THE Pi IS HARDWARE
Most linux distros are effectively the same; most apps require exactly the same instructions to get working on whatever distribution is in use. Having many multiple forums (and I already think there are too many) means information that is relevant (i.e. most of it) to all is lost in a distro specific place. If we have a forum for every Pi distro, there would be dozens with only a few posts in each one.
The only reason for distro specific posts is where you have problems installing that particular distro or simply getting it up and running. That should be handled by the person rolling the distro esp. if that distro does't have a link to download from here. Or make the particular distro clear in a forum post title in the general Linux questions area.

Why? What entitles us to a standardised benchmark?Super-Nathan wrote: it is not appropriate or fair to host forums or downloads, an ipso facto endorsement, of various other distros selectively without a standardized benchmark or threshhold to get a spot on this forum
Why do you need to ask which OS? In most cases, questions that arise here are Linux generic..Cloudcentric wrote:SN I quite agree and am fed up with the present system where I have to keep asking what Operating System......................................
I have changed to using prosilver board layout because with raspite one can find anything anywhere unrelated.
it seems like "Raspbian derivatives" should at leastShiftPlusOne wrote: It's not about endorsement or popularity, it's about support for the user. Look at the distros which currently have their own subforum. The distros there are all very different to each other from the user's standpoint. If someone needs help with riscos, then a freebsd user is probably not the person to ask. And that applies to each of the distros on the list in reference to each of the other. When it comes to Raspbian derivatives, that's not the case. If you can find a set of questions relating to pibang the answers to which are not the same as they would be for raspbian, and if you can show that these questions pop up often then there might be a case to be made against that point.