Most probably, what you're seeing is variations in focus.ab1jx wrote: Just got my 3rd v 1.3 camera and I'm wondering if there are variations in quality between individual cameras. This one seems a lot better than the last
I finally got around to adding some calibration to the script, consider it beta at present until it's proved. Tried it on a target in the garage, hence the square star below, but I don't expect to see any stars this week due to the weather . Note you can't test RA with a fixed target.DarkHelmet wrote: ↑Wed Dec 28, 2016 2:12 amI just downloaded your Autoguider software and got it up and running using a Celestron Digital Microscope. Next I'll fab an interface board and try it with my CGEM.
Q: How do I "train" the autoguider about the orientation and magnitude of movements? Other autoguider systems go through an orientation process since the guide camera could be at some arbitrary rotation angle relative to RA and Dec axes. Is this done manually with your software?
Users browsing this forum: Pugly and 16 guests