What can I do?
It is running retropie.
It does have a heatsink!
Thanks so much!
Code: Select all
vcgencmd measure_temp72.4C is not too hot. The Pi3 will start to throttle above 80, but you aren't even close to that.We__Create wrote:My Raspberry Pi 3 heats to 72.4 degres celsius! I am afraid it will burn![]()
What can I do?
It is running retropie.
It does have a heatsink!
Thanks so much!
You're OK, paper doesn't burn until it reaches 451°F (232.8°C)We__Create wrote:My Raspberry Pi 3 heats to 72.4 degres celsius! I am afraid it will burn![]()
Because you say so, or do you have official documentation to back that up?wh7qq wrote:...
...but prolonged running at that high temp will shorten life.
DougieLawson wrote:You're OK, paper doesn't burn until it reaches 451°F (232.8°C)
I think it has been mentioned a few times here that running a Pi overclocked/at a high temperature may reduce the expected lifespan from 35+ years to under 30 years.HawaiianPi wrote:Because you say so, or do you have official documentation to back that up?wh7qq wrote:...
...but prolonged running at that high temp will shorten life.
OH MY GOD!!rpdom wrote:I think it has been mentioned a few times here that running a Pi overclocked/at a high temperature may reduce the expected lifespan from 35+ years to under 30 years.
Often with semiconductor electronics one hears the rule of thumb that "every extra 10 degrees centrigrade halves the rated service life". So if a product is designed and quality controlled to have 10000 cycles of life at 25ºC, then going to 35 permanently will cause service life of something like 5000 cycles. This is based on experience in industry but ultimately stems from thermodynamics. So, even without documentation anyone can rightly suspect that excessive temperatures are to be avoided in electronics. But, of course, any rational end user will also realize that most electronics products we use get obsoleted, for other reasons, long long before the end of service life.Because you say so, or do you have official documentation to back that up?
It is in a closed case. Case has holes though.wh7qq wrote:1. Is it in an enclosure? Open it up.
2. How is your heat sink attached? Some of the heat sink tapes don't conduct very well. Remove the heat sink, carefully scrape the tape off of sink or chip...don't gouge either. Use a thin coat of a good grade of heat sink grease such as arctic silver to replace sink. Absent the adhesive, you probably will need to keep the Pi flat.
3. The Pi will start throttling the cpu at 80 deg, ahead of burning up. How are you measuring temp? In a terminal,is good enough. 72.8 is hot but not dangerous...but prolonged running at that high temp will shorten life.Code: Select all
vcgencmd measure_temp
4. Last resort, add a fan.
5. If possible, avoid java script.
And... how do you know that 72.4C is excessive? Do you have the temperature specifications of the BCM2837 SOC?tpylkko wrote:So, even without documentation anyone can rightly suspect that excessive temperatures are to be avoided in electronics.
Hot is good, but it doesn't mean it's dissipating enough heat. Most of the heatsinks available for the Raspberry Pi are too small to be of any use at all. All they will do is allow your system to run a tiny bit longer before overheating (assuming you are doing something that will actually cause overheating, which is not that easy to do).We__Create wrote:It is in a closed case. Case has holes though.
The heatsink gets hot af so it should be working.
If you saw this icon it means your system was throttling down to prevent overheating, but it had not actually overheated.We__Create wrote:... I decided to check when I saw a thermonoter icon at the side if my screen.


That question might have made sense had I claimed to know such. But when it is so obviously clear that I didn't, maybe you misunderstood something?HawaiianPi wrote:And... how do you know that 72.4C is excessive? Do you have the temperature specifications of the BCM2837 SOC?tpylkko wrote:So, even without documentation anyone can rightly suspect that excessive temperatures are to be avoided in electronics.
wh7qq wrote:If all you are doing is playing games, nobody GAS but if you need to have your RPi running 24/7 doing something serious...well, "...go ahead sucker, make your day (or night)". Testing at 120C or not, somebody in design decided it was a good idea to put on the brakes at 80-85 C. The chip may be ok at 80C but thermal cycling of solder joints... Since I have to live with the consequences of device failure, I tend to be pretty conservative on my home automation devices. OTOH, I run my 3 pretty hot because I have other desktops as backup and if it blows, I am out $40 and some time but nothing else. I just use this for browsing and email.
Do you think that isn't taken into account when designing and testing parts like these?wh7qq wrote:Stuff expands and contracts with cycling...the nature of metals, plastics and virtually anything that goes into electronic devices. Differences in rate of thermal expansion for different materials results in mechanical stresses that can cause joint failure. The less that occurs, the fewer failures that occur.
I do not, and never have claimed to, represent the Raspberry Pi Foundation. I don't know where you got that idea from.wh7qq wrote:The Raspberry Pi Foundation which you represent
I am very sorry, you are correct. I got you confused with jamesh who has it in his signature. Kindly accept my apology.rpdom wrote:I do not, and never have claimed to, represent the Raspberry Pi Foundation. I don't know where you got that idea from.wh7qq wrote:The Raspberry Pi Foundation which you represent
In fact, I don't work for them either (yet!). However, for the last 8 years I have worked for semiconductor manufacturers so have some experience in the matter. I am also quite familiar with the process of getting chips on to PCB's.wh7qq wrote:I am very sorry, you are correct. I got you confused with jamesh who has it in his signature. Kindly accept my apology.rpdom wrote:I do not, and never have claimed to, represent the Raspberry Pi Foundation. I don't know where you got that idea from.wh7qq wrote:The Raspberry Pi Foundation which you represent