Building a frequency generator

[dingus]

Hi,

I'm interested in building a frequency generator / frequency detector similar to the Asyra or Qest4:
http://www.asyra.co.uk/the-asyra-system/
https://www.qest4.eu/

If I understand correctly, these systems have a frequency generator and frequency receiver/detector that is able to send a particular frequency through your body (skin contact) and measure the results coming from your other hand.

Background:
http://www.scienceoflife.nl/html/qi_-_b ... ncies.html

There is also a product called Spooky2:
https://www.spooky2.com/

Which seems to be very similar, if you use the Spooky2 generator + Pulse scanner:
https://www.spooky2-mall.com/spooky-acc ... ption.html


Most of these require a full PC to operate.

My question for the community at this point is whether it seems to be a good fit for a Raspberry Pi platform in general. I'm a web designer, fairly tech-savvy, but I've only recently started learning about frequencies, frequency generators, etc. Any insight or guidance would be much appreciated.

Thanks!
Nate

[Gavinmc42]

Lower freq can be done with the PWM, 2 channels
https://ultibo.org/forum/viewtopic.php? ... &hilit=pwm

Higher freqs with GPCLK0
https://ultibo.org/forum/viewtopic.php? ... clk0#p3375

There is no way to get 100GHz, lots of mumbo jumbo on those pages,
But as a Tai Chi and Reiki practitioner just because someone does not understand does not mean the effects are not real.

[scotty101]

just because someone does not understand does not mean the effects are not real.

Despite the fact that peer review and double blind trials show that this kind of nonsense is no better than a placebo.
Just because a paper states Heisenberg's uncertainty principle it does not mean that it is factual.

[dingus]

just because someone does not understand does not mean the effects are not real.

Despite the fact that peer review and double blind trials show that this kind of nonsense is no better than a placebo.
Just because a paper states Heisenberg's uncertainty principle it does not mean that it is factual.

Proof? Would love to review these double blind studies. Because this stuff has been the only thing that's worked for me, compared to 2+ decades of failures coming from treatments via mainstream medical treatment.

[Gavinmc42]

Read the Harvard Medical School Guide to Tai Chi book.
It is the opposite to those mumbo jumbo pages that throw out jargon.
The Placebo effect is real and is about perceptions.
Healthy mind - healthy body.

70% of our bodies is water, it turns out water is weirder than we think.
https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists ... quid-water
Metal alloys have different properties than base metals.
What happens when stuff gets added to water in our 37 degree body temp?

"No one really understands water,"

Asyra/QEST is similar tech to Scientology's E-Meter?
Which is similar to Bio-feedback or ECG, GSR Skin conductance....

Just about everyone seems to have a fitbit these days.
With a bit of extra training, anyone can learn to control heart-rate and heart-rate variability and skin conductivity.
With a MAX30100 sensor you could make one for a Zero based portable version.

But let's ignore all that and just focus on the tech.

There are many sensors now for Wearables Pi's can talk too.
Show everyone how to make a Frequency based GSR meter and lets them run their own experiments for themselves.